Looking Back at the iPhone 9: What Apple Never Released

Apple’s iPhone lineup has followed a mostly predictable numerical sequence—until 2017, when the tech giant made a bold leap from iPhone 8 directly to iPhone X, skipping the number 9 entirely. For years, speculation has swirled around this intentional omission. In this article, we break down the real reasons Apple never released the iPhone 9, what it could have been, and how the decision shaped Apple’s product strategy and branding.

The Timeline: iPhone 8, Then… iPhone X?

When Apple launched the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus in September 2017, most expected an iPhone 9 to follow the traditional naming pattern. But instead, Apple unveiled the iPhone X (pronounced “ten”) alongside them. It was a dramatic shift, signaling the 10th anniversary of the iPhone line, but the decision to skip “9” puzzled consumers and tech experts alike.

Apple’s approach was not a mistake—it was a calculated branding move that marked the transition to a new generation of iPhones. The iPhone X introduced:

  • Face ID facial recognition
  • Edge-to-edge OLED display
  • Removal of the home button
  • Animoji and TrueDepth camera systems

These innovations made the iPhone X not just a successor to the 8, but a paradigm shift, bypassing what the iPhone 9 would have represented: an evolutionary step, not a revolutionary one.

Why the iPhone 9 Never Happened

1. Marketing Strategy Over Numerical Order

Apple has always been a branding powerhouse, and skipping the iPhone 9 gave the company room to align the iPhone with its own 10-year anniversary. The number 10 carries symbolic weight, especially in Western culture where decades are seen as major milestones. An iPhone 9 would have diluted that impact.

Moreover, by jumping to “X,” Apple created a distinct separation between the “old” and “new” iPhone eras. It made iPhone X feel like the beginning of a new age—a clear departure from the past.

2. Avoiding Confusion With Windows 9

Though Apple and Microsoft are direct competitors, tech industry consumers overlap heavily, and perception matters. Microsoft notably skipped Windows 9, jumping from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10. There was speculation that the number 9 might be unlucky or confusing due to legacy code issues and older systems checking for “Windows 9” as shorthand for 95/98.

While Apple’s reasoning wasn’t technical, maintaining a brand distinction from similar version jumps likely influenced the decision to bypass “9.”

3. Aligning With the iPhone X’s Innovation Leap

Apple positioned the iPhone X as not just a new phone but a technological milestone. Including an iPhone 9 in the lineup would have diluted that narrative. iPhone 9 would likely have shared too much with the iPhone 8, creating unnecessary confusion in the product range.

What Would the iPhone 9 Have Been Like?

Let’s imagine a world where Apple did release the iPhone 9. Based on historical progression, it would have been:

  • A transitional model between the iPhone 8 and iPhone X
  • LCD display, not OLED
  • Touch ID instead of Face ID
  • Likely housed in an aluminum body, not the stainless steel of the iPhone X
  • Priced between $699 and $799

Essentially, the iPhone 9 would have been incremental, not groundbreaking. And for a company like Apple, known for pushing boundaries, releasing a product that merely filled the gap would have undercut the drama and momentum of the iPhone X launch.

How Skipping iPhone 9 Impacted the Brand

Apple’s decision had long-term ripple effects on both branding and consumer expectations.

1. Increased Brand Value Through Boldness

By skipping a number, Apple demonstrated confidence and vision. The leap in design and features from iPhone 8 to X matched the leap in naming. It reinforced the narrative that Apple was ahead of its time, a leader—not a follower.

2. Set a New Tone for Product Releases

The move set a precedent. Apple has since been more flexible with naming conventions:

  • iPhone SE (2020 & 2022) revived the small phone trend.
  • iPhone 12 Mini bucked expectations in a large-phone-dominated market.
  • iPhone 14 Plus revived the “Plus” moniker from earlier models.

The numbering system now takes a backseat to messaging, features, and audience targeting.

Consumer Reactions and Industry Buzz

Confusion Turned to Curiosity

Initially, the skip caused confusion. People wondered if they had missed something. Search engine data in late 2017 showed a massive spike in queries for “iPhone 9”—proving there was demand, even if short-lived.

Fuel for Speculation

The absence of an iPhone 9 has led to endless speculation and viral theories, many of which continue to dominate Apple forums and subreddits.

Some rumors claimed the iPhone 9 existed in prototype form. Others suggested Apple planned to launch it as a budget model in emerging markets. But these theories remain unverified, adding to the model’s mystique.

The iPhone SE (2nd Gen): A Spiritual Successor?

Some argue that the iPhone SE (2020) essentially filled the role of the iPhone 9:

  • Released in April 2020
  • Shared similar design language with iPhone 8
  • Used the A13 Bionic chip from the iPhone 11
  • Retained Touch ID and a Home button

It provided a budget-friendly, no-frills iPhone that bridged the gap between legacy design and modern performance—precisely what the iPhone 9 would have offered. In many ways, SE 2020 is the iPhone 9, just under a different name.

iPhone Naming Evolution After the X

Apple’s iPhone lineup post-X shows how the company continues to evolve:

YearModel
2017iPhone 8 / iPhone X
2018iPhone XR / XS / XS Max
2019iPhone 11 / 11 Pro / 11 Pro Max
2020iPhone SE (2nd Gen) / iPhone 12 Series
2021iPhone 13 Series
2022iPhone SE (3rd Gen) / iPhone 14 Series
2023iPhone 15 Series
2024iPhone 16 (anticipated)

The pattern confirms that Apple is no longer bound by numbers in sequential order but driven by product storytelling and marketing momentum.

Conclusion: The iPhone 9 Is A Ghost That Strengthens Apple’s Legacy

The iPhone 9 will remain one of Apple’s most curious absences, but its nonexistence is just as telling as the models that followed. Apple chose to move past it—not because it couldn’t make it, but because releasing it would have weakened a narrative of innovation and evolution.

In the end, the iPhone 9’s void created space for boldness, allowing the iPhone X to usher in a new era without the burden of incremental updates. Apple has never looked back, and neither has the market.

Read more on Tech Today for expert analysis, mobile innovation insights, and in-depth coverage of Apple’s most elusive tech decisions.